Skip to content
Commit b1f44e13 authored by David S. Miller's avatar David S. Miller
Browse files

sparc32: Be less strict in matching %lo part of relocation.



The "(insn & 0x01800000) != 0x01800000" test matches 'restore'
but that is a legitimate place to see the %lo() part of a 32-bit
symbol relocation, particularly in tail calls.

Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Tested-by: default avatarSergei Trofimovich <slyfox@gentoo.org>
parent dbf2b92d
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment