sparc32: Be less strict in matching %lo part of relocation.
The "(insn & 0x01800000) != 0x01800000" test matches 'restore' but that is a legitimate place to see the %lo() part of a 32-bit symbol relocation, particularly in tail calls. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Tested-by: Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@gentoo.org>
Loading
Please register or sign in to comment