Skip to content
Commit 87c31b39 authored by Linus Torvalds's avatar Linus Torvalds
Browse files

Merge branch 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ebiederm/user-namespace



Pull user namespace related fixes from Eric Biederman:
 "As these are bug fixes almost all of thes changes are marked for
  backporting to stable.

  The first change (implicitly adding MNT_NODEV on remount) addresses a
  regression that was created when security issues with unprivileged
  remount were closed.  I go on to update the remount test to make it
  easy to detect if this issue reoccurs.

  Then there are a handful of mount and umount related fixes.

  Then half of the changes deal with the a recently discovered design
  bug in the permission checks of gid_map.  Unix since the beginning has
  allowed setting group permissions on files to less than the user and
  other permissions (aka ---rwx---rwx).  As the unix permission checks
  stop as soon as a group matches, and setgroups allows setting groups
  that can not later be dropped, results in a situtation where it is
  possible to legitimately use a group to assign fewer privileges to a
  process.  Which means dropping a group can increase a processes
  privileges.

  The fix I have adopted is that gid_map is now no longer writable
  without privilege unless the new file /proc/self/setgroups has been
  set to permanently disable setgroups.

  The bulk of user namespace using applications even the applications
  using applications using user namespaces without privilege remain
  unaffected by this change.  Unfortunately this ix breaks a couple user
  space applications, that were relying on the problematic behavior (one
  of which was tools/selftests/mount/unprivileged-remount-test.c).

  To hopefully prevent needing a regression fix on top of my security
  fix I rounded folks who work with the container implementations mostly
  like to be affected and encouraged them to test the changes.

    > So far nothing broke on my libvirt-lxc test bed. :-)
    > Tested with openSUSE 13.2 and libvirt 1.2.9.
> Tested-by: default avatarRichard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>

    > Tested on Fedora20 with libvirt 1.2.11, works fine.
> Tested-by: default avatarChen Hanxiao <chenhanxiao@cn.fujitsu.com>

    > Ok, thanks - yes, unprivileged lxc is working fine with your kernels.
    > Just to be sure I was testing the right thing I also tested using
    > my unprivileged nsexec testcases, and they failed on setgroup/setgid
    > as now expected, and succeeded there without your patches.
> Tested-by: default avatarSerge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@ubuntu.com>

    > I tested this with Sandstorm.  It breaks as is and it works if I add
    > the setgroups thing.
    > Tested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> # breaks things as designed :("

* 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ebiederm/user-namespace:
  userns: Unbreak the unprivileged remount tests
  userns; Correct the comment in map_write
  userns: Allow setting gid_maps without privilege when setgroups is disabled
  userns: Add a knob to disable setgroups on a per user namespace basis
  userns: Rename id_map_mutex to userns_state_mutex
  userns: Only allow the creator of the userns unprivileged mappings
  userns: Check euid no fsuid when establishing an unprivileged uid mapping
  userns: Don't allow unprivileged creation of gid mappings
  userns: Don't allow setgroups until a gid mapping has been setablished
  userns: Document what the invariant required for safe unprivileged mappings.
  groups: Consolidate the setgroups permission checks
  mnt: Clear mnt_expire during pivot_root
  mnt: Carefully set CL_UNPRIVILEGED in clone_mnt
  mnt: Move the clear of MNT_LOCKED from copy_tree to it's callers.
  umount: Do not allow unmounting rootfs.
  umount: Disallow unprivileged mount force
  mnt: Update unprivileged remount test
  mnt: Implicitly add MNT_NODEV on remount when it was implicitly added by mount
parents f045bbb9 db86da7c
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment