Skip to content
Commit 3b254c54 authored by Patrick McHardy's avatar Patrick McHardy
Browse files

netfilter: nf_conntrack_proto: fix warning with CONFIG_PROVE_RCU

===================================================
[ INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage. ]
---------------------------------------------------
include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_l3proto.h:92 invoked rcu_dereference_check()
without protection!

other info that might help us debug this:

rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 0
2 locks held by iptables/3197:
 #0:  (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8149bd8c>]
ip_setsockopt+0x7c/0xa0
 #1:  (&xt[i].mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8148a5fe>]
xt_find_table_lock+0x3e/0x110

stack backtrace:
Pid: 3197, comm: iptables Not tainted 2.6.34-rc4 #2
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff8105e2e8>] lockdep_rcu_dereference+0xb8/0xc0
 [<ffffffff8147fb3b>] nf_ct_l3proto_module_put+0x6b/0x70
 [<ffffffff8148d891>] state_mt_destroy+0x11/0x20
 [<ffffffff814d3baf>] cleanup_match+0x2f/0x50
 [<ffffffff814d3c63>] cleanup_entry+0x33/0x90
 [<ffffffff814d5653>] ? __do_replace+0x1a3/0x210
 [<ffffffff814d564c>] __do_replace+0x19c/0x210
 [<ffffffff814d651a>] do_ipt_set_ctl+0x16a/0x1b0
 [<ffffffff8147a610>] nf_sockopt+0x60/0xa0
...

The __nf_ct_l3proto_find() call doesn't actually need rcu read side
protection since the caller holds a reference to the protocol. Use
rcu_read_lock() anyways to avoid the warning.

Kernel bugzilla #15781: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15781



Reported-by: default avatarChristian Casteyde <casteyde.christian@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPatrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
parent e772c349
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment