bitops: Fix shift overflow in GENMASK macros
On some 32 bits architectures, including x86, GENMASK(31, 0) returns 0 instead of the expected ~0UL. This is the same on some 64 bits architectures with GENMASK_ULL(63, 0). This is due to an overflow in the shift operand, 1 << 32 for GENMASK, 1 << 64 for GENMASK_ULL. Reported-by: Eric Paire <eric.paire@st.com> Suggested-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@st.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.13+ Cc: linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk Cc: gong.chen@linux.intel.com Cc: John Sullivan <jsrhbz@kanargh.force9.co.uk> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Fixes: 10ef6b0d ("bitops: Introduce a more generic BITMASK macro") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1415267659-10563-1-git-send-email-maxime.coquelin@st.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Loading
Please register or sign in to comment