udf: potential integer overflow
bloc->logicalBlockNum is unsigned so it's never less than zero. When I saw that, it made me worry that "bloc->logicalBlockNum + count" could overflow. That's why I changed the check for less than zero to an overflow check. (The test works because "count" is also unsigned.) Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Loading
Please register or sign in to comment