Skip to content
Commit 466153fc authored by Nigel Croxon's avatar Nigel Croxon Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman
Browse files

Don't jump to compute_result state from check_result state



commit 4f4fd7c5798bbdd5a03a60f6269cf1177fbd11ef upstream.

Changing state from check_state_check_result to
check_state_compute_result not only is unsafe but also doesn't
appear to serve a valid purpose.  A raid6 check should only be
pushing out extra writes if doing repair and a mis-match occurs.
The stripe dev management will already try and do repair writes
for failing sectors.

This patch makes the raid6 check_state_check_result handling
work more like raid5's.  If somehow too many failures for a
check, just quit the check operation for the stripe.  When any
checks pass, don't try and use check_state_compute_result for
a purpose it isn't needed for and is unsafe for.  Just mark the
stripe as in sync for passing its parity checks and let the
stripe dev read/write code and the bad blocks list do their
job handling I/O errors.

Repro steps from Xiao:

These are the steps to reproduce this problem:
1. redefined OPT_MEDIUM_ERR_ADDR to 12000 in scsi_debug.c
2. insmod scsi_debug.ko dev_size_mb=11000  max_luns=1 num_tgts=1
3. mdadm --create /dev/md127 --level=6 --raid-devices=5 /dev/sde1 /dev/sde2 /dev/sde3 /dev/sde5 /dev/sde6
sde is the disk created by scsi_debug
4. echo "2" >/sys/module/scsi_debug/parameters/opts
5. raid-check

It panic:
[ 4854.730899] md: data-check of RAID array md127
[ 4854.857455] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdr] tag#80 FAILED Result: hostbyte=DID_OK driverbyte=DRIVER_SENSE
[ 4854.859246] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdr] tag#80 Sense Key : Medium Error [current]
[ 4854.860694] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdr] tag#80 Add. Sense: Unrecovered read error
[ 4854.862207] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdr] tag#80 CDB: Read(10) 28 00 00 00 2d 88 00 04 00 00
[ 4854.864196] print_req_error: critical medium error, dev sdr, sector 11656 flags 0
[ 4854.867409] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdr] tag#100 FAILED Result: hostbyte=DID_OK driverbyte=DRIVER_SENSE
[ 4854.869469] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdr] tag#100 Sense Key : Medium Error [current]
[ 4854.871206] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdr] tag#100 Add. Sense: Unrecovered read error
[ 4854.872858] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdr] tag#100 CDB: Read(10) 28 00 00 00 2e e0 00 00 08 00
[ 4854.874587] print_req_error: critical medium error, dev sdr, sector 12000 flags 4000
[ 4854.876456] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdr] tag#101 FAILED Result: hostbyte=DID_OK driverbyte=DRIVER_SENSE
[ 4854.878552] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdr] tag#101 Sense Key : Medium Error [current]
[ 4854.880278] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdr] tag#101 Add. Sense: Unrecovered read error
[ 4854.881846] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdr] tag#101 CDB: Read(10) 28 00 00 00 2e e8 00 00 08 00
[ 4854.883691] print_req_error: critical medium error, dev sdr, sector 12008 flags 4000
[ 4854.893927] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdr] tag#166 FAILED Result: hostbyte=DID_OK driverbyte=DRIVER_SENSE
[ 4854.896002] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdr] tag#166 Sense Key : Medium Error [current]
[ 4854.897561] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdr] tag#166 Add. Sense: Unrecovered read error
[ 4854.899110] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdr] tag#166 CDB: Read(10) 28 00 00 00 2e e0 00 00 10 00
[ 4854.900989] print_req_error: critical medium error, dev sdr, sector 12000 flags 0
[ 4854.902757] md/raid:md127: read error NOT corrected!! (sector 9952 on sdr1).
[ 4854.904375] md/raid:md127: read error NOT corrected!! (sector 9960 on sdr1).
[ 4854.906201] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 4854.907341] kernel BUG at drivers/md/raid5.c:4190!

raid5.c:4190 above is this BUG_ON:

    handle_parity_checks6()
        ...
        BUG_ON(s->uptodate < disks - 1); /* We don't need Q to recover */

Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.16+
OriginalAuthor: David Jeffery <djeffery@redhat.com>
Cc: Xiao Ni <xni@redhat.com>
Tested-by: default avatarDavid Jeffery <djeffery@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Jeffy <djeffery@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarNigel Croxon <ncroxon@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarSong Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent 913fbfc3
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment