Skip to content
Commit 5bf37ec3 authored by Serge E. Hallyn's avatar Serge E. Hallyn Committed by James Morris
Browse files

cap_prctl: don't set error to 0 at 'no_change'



One-liner: capsh --print is broken without this patch.

In certain cases, cap_prctl returns error > 0 for success.  However,
the 'no_change' label was always setting error to 0.  As a result,
for example, 'prctl(CAP_BSET_READ, N)' would always return 0.
It should return 1 if a process has N in its bounding set (as
by default it does).

I'm keeping the no_change label even though it's now functionally
the same as 'error'.

Signed-off-by: default avatarSerge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>
Acked-by: default avatarDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJames Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
parent 577c9c45
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment