Logically revert previous attempts on Bug 139806621
To explore different approaches to tackle Bug 139806621, this CL first reverts our previous attempts [1][2] that turned out to be not successful as we hoped [3]. Our high level strategy is 1) temporarily going back to our previous well-known algorithm first then 2) trying a different approach. In this way, hopefully we can maximize the chance of fixing Bug 139806621 with minimizing the total complexity. Also any unconfirmed regressions that we might have introduced in our previous attempt other than Bug 144103599 and Bug 144174015 are expected to disappear after this revert. [1]: I6aa4a664cfd0c86f75cee2457715317194bbe5e2 e0172102 [2]: I98cb044d8cbfb80480312a3923f168aefa9b7e7d 322ee9bf [3]: Still seeing that the UI thread is being blocked at the later point. Also triaging cost of regressions such as Bug 144103599, Bug 144174015 and Bug 147331480 Bug: 139806621 Test: atest CtsInputMethodTestCases CtsInputMethodServiceHostTestCases Change-Id: Id73f0d5efb68bb4c5c8ef3dfb974c7a4f9457581
Loading
Please register or sign in to comment