Skip to content
Commit 87e9f031 authored by WANG Cong's avatar WANG Cong Committed by David S. Miller
Browse files

ipv4: fix a potential deadlock in mcast getsockopt() path



Sasha reported the following lockdep warning:

  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

        CPU0                    CPU1
        ----                    ----
   lock(sk_lock-AF_INET);
                                lock(rtnl_mutex);
                                lock(sk_lock-AF_INET);
   lock(rtnl_mutex);

This is due to that for IP_MSFILTER and MCAST_MSFILTER, we take
rtnl lock before the socket lock in setsockopt() path, but take
the socket lock before rtnl lock in getsockopt() path. All the
rest optnames are setsockopt()-only.

Fix this by aligning the getsockopt() path with the setsockopt()
path, so that all mcast socket path would be locked in the same
order.

Note, IPv6 part is different where rtnl lock is not held.

Fixes: 54ff9ef3 ("ipv4, ipv6: kill ip_mc_{join, leave}_group and ipv6_sock_mc_{join, drop}")
Reported-by: default avatarSasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Cc: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarCong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarMarcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 4ee3bd4a
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment