f2fs: fix to check return value of f2fs_reserve_new_block()
[ Upstream commit 956fa1ddc132e028f3b7d4cf17e6bfc8cb36c7fd ] Let's check return value of f2fs_reserve_new_block() in do_recover_data() rather than letting it fails silently. Also refactoring check condition on return value of f2fs_reserve_new_block() as below: - trigger f2fs_bug_on() only for ENOSPC case; - use do-while statement to avoid redundant codes; Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: improbir <ghosh_probir@yahoo.com> Signed-off-by: ij-israfil <israfilkhan494gmail.com>
Loading
Please register or sign in to comment