Skip to content
Commit 9de8d686 authored by Thomas Gleixner's avatar Thomas Gleixner Committed by Ingo Molnar
Browse files

perf/x86/intel/rapl: Convert it to a per package facility



RAPL is a per package facility and we already have a mechanism for a dedicated
per package reader. So there is no point to have multiple CPUs doing the
same. The current implementation actually starts two timers on two CPUs if one
does:

	perf stat -C1,2 -e -e power/energy-pkg ....

which makes the whole concept of 1 reader per package moot.

What's worse is that the above returns the double of the actual energy
consumption, but that's a different problem to address and cannot be solved by
removing the pointless per cpuness of that mechanism.

Signed-off-by: default avatarThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi.kleen@intel.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Harish Chegondi <harish.chegondi@intel.com>
Cc: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160222221012.845369524@linutronix.de


Signed-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
parent 8a6d2f8f
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment