mm: don't avoid high-priority reclaim on memcg limit reclaim
Commit 246e87a9 ("memcg: fix get_scan_count() for small targets") sought to avoid high reclaim priorities for memcg by forcing it to scan a minimum amount of pages when lru_pages >> priority yielded nothing. This was done at a time when reclaim decisions like dirty throttling were tied to the priority level. Nowadays, the only meaningful thing still tied to priority dropping below DEF_PRIORITY - 2 is gating whether laptop_mode=1 is generally allowed to write. But that is from an era where direct reclaim was still allowed to call ->writepage, and kswapd nowadays avoids writes until it's scanned every clean page in the system. Potential changes to how quick sc->may_writepage could trigger are of little concern. Remove the force_scan stuff, as well as the ugly multi-pass target calculation that it necessitated. Change-Id: I8dfe2fded0b57408ba4b8d942e2293c53954937f Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170228214007.5621-7-hannes@cmpxchg.org Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Acked-by: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Jia He <hejianet@gmail.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Git-commit: 688035f729dcd9a98152c827338805a061f5c6fa Git-repo: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git Signed-off-by: Vinayak Menon <vinmenon@codeaurora.org>
Loading
Please register or sign in to comment