Skip to content
Commit 78349b56 authored by Jiyong Park's avatar Jiyong Park
Browse files

Record the actual APEXes that a module is part of.

Consider this case:

apex {
    name: "com.android.foo",
    native_libs: ["foo"],
}

override_apex {
    name: "com.mycompany.android.foo",
    base: "com.android.foo",
}

cc_library {
    name: "foo",
}

There are two APEXes defined: "com.android.foo" and
"com.mycompany.android.foo" which is a copy of "com.android.foo" with
some properties overridden (e.g. signing keys).

The module "foo" is mutated into two variants by the apex mutator: the
platform variant and the apex variant. The former has the variation name
"" and the later has "apex<min_api_ver>" which usually is "apex10000".

Internally, the apex variant has an alias "com.android.foo".

ApexInfo.InApexVariants() returns only "com.android.foo" when called for
the module "foo".

We can see that the information that "foo" is also part of
"com.mycompany.android.foo" is completely lost. This is causing problem
when we compare the apex membership by their "soong module name", not
the "apex name". In the example above, the two modules have different
soone module names, but have the same apex name: "com.android.foo".

To fix that, this CL introduces a new field `InApexes` to the `ApexInfo`
struct. It has the actual name of the APEXes that the module is part of.
With the example above, `InApexes` is ["com.android.foo",
"com.mycompany.android.foo"].

Bug: 180325915
Test: m nothing
Test: m nothing on non-AOSP targets with ag/13740887 applied.

Change-Id: I4e7a7ac5495d2e622ba92a4358ed967e066c6c2e
parent ab50b079
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment