cpufreq: fix comment about return value of cpufreq_register_driver()
The comment has been incorrect since commit 4dea5806 ("cpufreq: return EEXIST instead of EBUSY for second registering"). Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Loading
Please register or sign in to comment